Filed under: Biblical Studies and Interpretation, Greek Exegesis and Resources, Uncategorized
The folks over at Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians have quite a helpful blog if you are interested in Galatians. Among the great services they provide are notifications of PhD dissertations that are available online. Recently, they posted concerning Bruce Hansen’s 2007 dissertation, “All of You are One.” I began reading the abstract and the initial pages as I am quite interested in this topic. Yet, I am quite puzzled! Hansen furthers what I think is a strange argument to make. Consider the following passages:
There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. (Gal 3:28)
For in the one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and we were all made to drink of one Spirit. (1 Cor 12:13)
In that renewal there is no longer Greek and Jew, circumcised and
uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave and free; but Christ is all and in all! (Col 3:11)
Can we reasonably say that these verses contain a formula which concern social divisions? Hansen writes, “this formula is universally recognized” (1). But, if this was a formula, wouldn’t it be the same in each context? No two contexts have this so-called formula written the same! Although “Jew and Greek…Slave and Free” are a common denominator, there are significant additions to this saying depending on the context. Anyone else have a problem with calling this a formula, or is it just me?
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
The fact that men/women are only mentioned in Galatians should cause us to consider your thoughts. I haven’t read any of Hansen yet so I don’t know how he defines formula but it does seem strange. His supervisors were Joel Green and Richard Bauckham so I would expect it to be a strong argument overall.
Comment by Thomas October 27, 2009 @ 1:14 pmWith Bauckham and Green, I expect great things. I look forward to finishing this dissertation.
One of the best works I’ve read, with regard to this issue in Gal 3:28 is:
Martin, Troy W. “The Covenant of Circumcision (Genesis 17:9-14) and the Situational Anthithesis in Galatians 3:28.” Journal of Biblical Literature 122/1 (2003): 111-25.
Martin argues that Gen 17 provides the backdrop for Paul’s seemingly disparate pairs in Gal 3:28.
Comment by sethmehorn October 27, 2009 @ 1:43 pm